Open Access

Development of 3D viewer based teleoperation interface for Human Support Robot HSR

  • Hiroaki Yaguchi1Email author,
  • Kenji Sato1,
  • Mitsuharu Kojima1,
  • Kiyohiro Sogen2,
  • Yutaka Takaoka2,
  • Masayoshi Tsuchinaga2,
  • Takashi Yamamoto2 and
  • Masayuki Inaba1
ROBOMECH Journal20141:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-014-0010-y

Received: 14 January 2014

Accepted: 4 July 2014

Published: 12 October 2014

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce 3D-viewer-based teleoperation system for manipulation task of Human Support Robot HSR. The system is integrated by three functions; 3D environment information visualization based on Manhattan-world assumption, known object recognition using LINE-MOD algorithm, and virtual teaching with 3D robot model using interactive marker. We show some experimental results of manipulation tasks using proposed system.

Keywords

Home robot Service robot Teleoperion

1Background

In Japan, population aging of society is estimated to progress faster than foreign countries, corresponding to shortage of labor and caregiver is a very serious problem. Also encouraging self-reliance support of elderly and handicapped persons is a very important problem to improve in a viewpoint of quality of life. To solve this problem, we are developing safety, small, wide working area, high functional Human Support Robot: HSR for elderly or handicapped person and their family or caregiver.

We also take operation test in house environment of the handicapped person, and evaluate object pickup task using tablet-based HMI: Human Machine Interface to correspond to the needs of “object handling with teleoperation” [1]. According to this operational test, we found problems of teleoperation HMI as follows;
  1. I)

    It is difficult to estimate distance to target object or space between robot and environment.

     

II) The consumer needs to use not custom-made shelf for robots with visual marker but normal shelf.

III) In object manipulation task, it is difficult to move a hand to target position correctly.

For teleoperation HMI, following functions are necessary;
  1. I)

    Wide-view environment information representation around robot and grasp target object

     

II) Known object recognition without visual marker

III) Robot operation HMI easy to understand robot status and to operate.

To realize these functions, we developed about 3D face set representation of environment converting from point clouds obtained 3D camera, robust and markerless known object recognition using Improved LINE-MOD, and motion teaching method to 3D robot model using interactive markers.

In this paper, we developed a novel teleoperation interface showing robot status, surrounding environment, and detected known objects on 3D viewer. We also constructed teleoperating/motion teaching system by operating 3D robot model on developped 3D viewer.

2HSR: Human Support Robot and teleoperation system

Human Support Robot HSR (Figure 1) is developed as small, light-weight, and safety mobile manipulator robot for the daily life environment, its footprint is 370 [mm] diameters, it has a retractable 7DoF single arm and an extensible body (having 1 DoF, slides by z axis), unholonomic differential 2 wheels base, and it also has a 3D camera and high resolution stereo cameras, and tablet on the Head. Head mounted tablet shows movie and audio of operator, like telepresens robot. High resolution camera is used to detect AR marker, the robot mainly measures external information from 3D camera as 640×480 colored point cloud.
Figure 1

Human Support Robot HSR.

In operation tests of object handling task is realized by combination of following 3 functions; Environment information representation using robot mounted camera image, Known object recognition using 2D visual marker, and Dialog based teleoperation user interface. Figure 2 shows a robot controller of dialog based HMI. This HMI supposes operation using the touch panel, surrounding environment of the robot is shown using head mounted camera image, robot action is selected from buttons on the right side of the screen, for each action different operation interface is called. Object recognition is realized by putting 2D visual markers on the environment. Problems of this system are following 3 points; 1) Using only 2D color image obtained from 3D camera, it is difficult to understand the environments around robot because it has a narrower viewing than human’s, and sometimes occlusion is occurred by the robot’s own body. 2) Object recognition using 2D visual marker limits usable objects from robots. It needs the initial cost to put markers on the environment, it also may be difficult to recognize markers due to size of markers, and distance from the robot, and sometimes objects can not be put markers. 3) Dialog based user interface can call only predefined tasks and cannot adjust detailed robot motions from the interface.
Figure 2

Human interface using dialog-based HMI.

Especially, in unknown real environment, it is very difficult to sense, plan, and act autonomously, so sometimes the direct operation of robot can be the most realistic and fastest way to achieve tasks. We also consider to operate structured object, such as furniture or doors, as a higher level task. In related works, Chitta et al. [2] achieved autonomous door opening task of PR2 using motion planning based on graph search with fast collision checking, assuming the door model is known. However, generally the door model is unknown, model teaching method of human is necessary. Sturm et al. proposed a furniture model construction method based on furniture tracking in operating motion. using assumption that front side of furniture has rectangle shape [3]. In this work the robot actually operated and obtained kinematics model of furniture. Azuma et al. proposed the multi touch tablet based interface limiting operation to push, pull, and revolve [4]. Operation type and amount are instructed directly on input image from camera. Azuma’s system can operate various structured objects with simple solution, however, this can not reuse instructed operation. Yamazaki et al. [5] proposed a method which can add manipulable object through creating models from texture and shape information measured by external sensors. Yamazaki defined the drawer opening task by the robot as combination of following sub tasks.

i) Teaching knowledge that is necessary to operate the object.

ii) Adding ID tags or artificial markers to target object.

iii) Teaching how to operate via teleoperation or direct teaching.

According to Yamazaki’s approach, robots can operate furniture when it has following 3 abilities;

i) Human can estimate necessary knowledge to operate from environment information.

ii) The robot can recognize a target object autonomously.

iii) The robot can be teleoperated.

These factors are consistent with problems of HMI described in the introduction.

We propose following 3 functions;

Light-weight and easy to understand environment information representation and storing.

Robust recognition and pose estimation of known objects.

Direct operating and motion teaching using 3D interactive robot model.

In this paper, we develop the user interface that can show robot pose and surrounding environment simultaneously by representing environment, object, and robot information on 3D viewer to teleoperate Human Support Robot HSR combining 3 functions.

Figure 3 shows the structure of the proposed system. Proposed system is constucted 3 parts; 3D indoor environment modeler, known 3D object detector, and 3D model based interactive teleoperator. Environment modeler and object detector use 3D image obtained from 3D camera, and display 3D environment and object model information on 3D viewer. Interactive teleoperator can control robot via 3D model displayed on 3D viewer. We also achieve the door opening task and the object pick-up task by teleoperation using the system.
Figure 3

System diagram of 3D viewer based HMI.

3Methods

3.1 3D environment reconstruction and representation

To realize a useful human machine interface, we propose the method to translate from 3D point cloud to orthogonal face set to show 3D environment information as lightweight and easy to understand representation on the 3D viewer.

We consider to employ 3D reconstruction method like Visual SLAM to show 3D environment information. RGBDSLAM [6] and KinectFusion [7] are popular visual SLAM method using 3D camera. In RGBDSLAM, environmental information is stored as dense point cloud using key frames of input images. KinectFusion [7] stores environment information as infinite 3d voxel. However these representation does not have enough shape features.

Indoor room environment has a feature that is constructed combination of orthogonal planes each other, like floor, ceiling and walls. This assumption about structure of indoor environment is called Manhattan-world assumption. Using this shape assumption, easy to understand environment information representation can be realized. Furukawa et al. [8] used this assumption to reconstruct and estimate structure of building using photograph database. Yaguchi et al. [9] applied this assumption to 3D camera and proposed the fast and lightweight method to construct 3D environment model of the room. In this paper we represent environment information using [9].

Figure 4 shows the face set model of room environment reconstructed from plural 3D images. 4 images in the left column are part of the images used for reconstruction, and an image in the right column is a reconstructed 3D model. The proposed system can represent a wide view 3D environment information with expanding viewing by combining face set of plural 3D images.
Figure 4

3D environment model based on Manhattan-world assumption.

Figure 5 shows the sequence of the proposed method. At first, orthogonal 3 dominant axis are estimated from distribution of the normal vectors of input point cloud and all points are segmented to 3 groups associated with dominant axis. The next plane position is estimated from distribution of position of points by direction of the associated dominant axis applying peak estimation. Bar graphs in the right side of Figure 5 shows histograms of points distribution. In this situation, red points have 3 peaks i.e. there are 3 planes in the red dominant axes, and the green and the blue axis have 2 and 1 plane(s) respectively. At last, face shape is estimated from associated points for each plane. The proposed method can translate from point cloud to orthogonal face set.
Figure 5

Sequence of 3D environment modeling.

On the other hand, points not assigned to any planes are obtained as a result. Each points are checked by normal vector direction and distance from the nearest plane. When a point hasdifferent directed normal from dominantaxis oris far from any planes, it is considered to violates the assumption. These points considered to represent details violating the assumption, so added to the model as a point cloud, as shown in Figure 6. In this figure, a shelf is represented as face set because its shape fulfills Manhattan-world assumption, on the other hand, a pot is represented as points because its shape violates the assumption.
Figure 6

Image of face set and rest points.

3.1.1 Evaluation

We evaluated the proposed method in [9]. Firstly, we evaluate the accuracy of plane estimation with the input images shown in Figure 7. Table 1 shows the result. In this evaluation, we compared distances between pairs of planes. Errors in plane estimation are less than 20 [mm] at about 2 [m] distance for all planes. We also evaluated about amount of model files using dataset shown in Figure 8. Table 2 shows the result. The proposed method can reduce the memory amount 10 – 20% from only using point cloud.
Figure 7

Input images for evaluation of plane position estimation. Input images for evaluation of plane position estimation. Right: input image, Left: Grouped point cloud using dominant axis, respectively. (a) Result (1), scene includes 2 dominant axis. (b) Result (2), scene includes 3 dominant axis.

Figure 8

Data set for evaluation of data compression. (a) Scene including cluttered objects. (b) Camera moved large rotation angle, about 180°. (c) Scene including narrow textures and camera moved long distance, about 6[m].

Table 1

Results of plane detection; Comparison distance between 2 planes

 

Estimated [mm]

Ground Truth [mm]

Microwave - Wall (1)

517

500

Dashboard - Floor (1)

439

430

Microwave - Wall (2)

511

500

Dashboard - Floor (2)

433

430

Table 2

Specification of 3d environment models

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

Input points size (ave.) [kB]

12800

12800

12800

Face set size (ave.) [kB]

934

349

519

Texture image size (ave.) [kB]

83.3

81.8

79.7

Rest points size (ave.) [kB]

1697

1462

881

compression rate [%]

21.2

14.8

11.6

Input points num

307200

307200

307200

Rest points num (ave.)

26115

22381

13631

Rejected rate [%]

8.50

7.29

4.44

3.2 Object recognition and pose estimation of known objects

To detect and estimate pose of known objects robustly, we propose improved LINE-MOD [10]. LINE-MOD is fast algorithm of known object detection and pose estimation using discrete multimodal features from images and normal vector distributions generated from 3D point cloud object model using virtual camera model in various view points as a template. LINE-MOD can recognize only with 3D shape feature without dense image texture than image-based recognition. Figure 9 shows the result of object detection. LINE-MOD also can detect plural objects and estimate its pose online by registering plural object models to the database. In this paper, we apply the algorithm to detect objects with narrow texture, such as door lever or plain dish.
Figure 9

Known object detection using LINE-MOD.

One of the problems of LINE-MOD is the result of pose estimation is unstable, so we improve robustness of pose estimation. Reasons of unstable pose estimation are, when the object has metallic luster it causes lack of depth information, and shadow creates edges which is not on object contour, as shown in Figure 10. To reduce these effects, in shilouette image generation phase, contour of objects can be detected correctly using a combination of texture edge and continuity of normal vectors. Various weights of modality features also reduce false positive.
Figure 10

Example of depth lack (left) and effect of shadow (right).

Figure 11 shows the algorithm of improved LINE-MOD. In learning phase, color and depth image set are generated, and oriented gradient from color image and direction of the normal vector from depth image are calcurated as templates from object model changing its pose respectively. In matching phase, oriented gradient and normal vector direction are also calcurated from input image, then model templates and input image are matched using these 2 features. It can detect and estimate pose of objects simultaneously from the pose of the model of matched template image.
Figure 11

Improved LINE-MOD.

3.2.1 Evaluation

We evaluated these improvements with door lever shown in right image of Figure 10 as shown in Figure 12. In Figure 12, transformation a is estimated using AR marker recognition, b is measured using a scale, c is calculated as external parameters from camera calibration result, and d is estimated using LINE-MOD. Transformation e is defined as an error and we define the true positive as estimated error is less than 30 [mm] in translation and 3° in rotation. Table 3 shows the result. We used 353 frame video with various camera poses. Using original LINE-MOD, the number of true positive is 57 frames, and the number of false positive is 197 frames. Using improved LINE-MOD, the number of true positive is 60 frames, and the number of false positive is 91 frames. The proposed method can reduce false positive from 56% to 25% with no reduction of true positive.
Figure 12

Image of evaluation of LINE-MOD. a: High-res camera to AR marker (estimated by marker detection and accurated enough), a: High-res camera to AR marker (estimated by marker detection and accurated enough), b: AR marker to handle (ground truth), c: High-res camera to 3D camera, d: 3D camera to handle (estimated by proposed method). Then error e is calcurated by comparison ab with cd.

Table 3

Results of door lever recognition

 

Positive

True positive

False positive

Original LINE-MOD

254/353 (72%)

57/353 (16%)

197/353 (56%)

Improved LINE-MOD

151/353 (43%)

60/353 (17%)

91/353 (25%)

3.3 Robot teleoperation and motion teaching using 3D robot model

To achieve teleoperation and motion teaching by intuitive action generation, we develop the teleoperation system to 3D robot model using interactive marker [11]. Interactive marker is a framework adding interactive operation functions from users through mouse input to 3D models on rviz, 3D viewer of ROS. Using this framework, users can teach motions directly to the robot through operating 3D robot model.

In this paper, we define following 3 levels of robot action;
  1. 1)

    Robot centric action: operating robot’s own motion directly. Interactive markers are fixed on the robot body.

     
  2. 2)

    Environment centric action: operating built-in structures in environment. Interactive markers are fixed on the environment.

     
  3. 3)

    Object centric action: operating objects. Interactive markers are fixed on detected objects using LINE-MOD.

     

These 3 actions are used from our interface simultaneously without changing modal, and robot task is realized as combination of these actions each other.

Motion teaching is also realized to record these action combination sequence and the robot can play back same task.

3.3.1 Robot centric action

In robot centric action, interactive markers for robot operation is shown with the robot model in the 3D viewer. User can operate not only joint level action, such as base moving or head direction, but also arm reaching action with setting target hand pose using a motion planner and inverse kinematics solver.

Figure 13 shows the basic interactive operation system for HSR. In robot centric action, the robot can act following basic functions;

Base move (Figure 13(a))

Neck pan/tilt (Figure 13(b))

Head up/down (Figure 13(b))

Hand reaching to target pose (Figure 13(c))

Gripper control
Figure 13

Interactive markers for operation of HSR. Each row shows; Top: Initial state of interactive markers, Middle: Marker is operated by user interation, Bottom: Robot model is moved via operation of marker, respectively.

and system can also teach and play back motion combining these basic functions.

To control these markers, user drags arrow or circular handles arround each joints by mouse, arrow handle can set moving distance, and circular handle can instruct rotation angle such as joint angle. In case of hand reaching marker, user can set target hand pose using 6 DoF arrow and circular handle directly, after setting target user click right button and select “go to target” from menu, then inverse kinematics is solved and motion is executed.

3.3.2 Environment centric action

In environment centric action, to realize the operation of movable structures, interactive markers are put on environment to describe the structure of objects using parent-child relationship of interactive markers.

To put interactive markers on the environment, we construct 6 DoF interactive marker which is not associated any parts but put onto the world coordinate. User can operate this marker freely and can copy anytime by right click and select “copy” from menu list. Parent-child relationship is also instructed from menu list of parent marker and select child marker one by one.

Focusing the door opening task as shown in Figure 14, motion of the hand pose in the door opening, it requires motions that revolving the door lever down, rotating around the pivot of the lever, and pulling the door rotating around the pivot of the door. Then considering to put interactive markers on the door and the door lever, the door lever is fixed on the door, and the door is fixed the room. When the door is moved, the door lever is moved together with the door, however, revolving of the door lever does not effect to the door. In this case, the door lever is defined as child objects of the door. The door opening task can be described using parent-child relationship of the door pivot, the door lever pivot, and target hand poses as grasp position on the door lever.
Figure 14

Parent-child relationship of Interactive Markers.

3.3.3 Object centric action

In object centric action, interactive markers are put on the recognition result of known objects and achieve operation teaching to object describing how to operate the object. Focusing the door structure in Figure 14 again, when recognizing the door lever as known object, rotational axis of the door are decided from estimated pose of the door lever, it can also adopt half-opened door or error of localization.

4Results and discussion

4.1 Task operation using 3D viewer based teleoperation interface

We evaluate the proposed system with 2 teleoperation task experimentation, pick-and-place task and door opening task. In the experiments one operator achieved task.

4.1.1 Object pick-and-place task

Firstly, we achieved pick-and-place task to carry known objects from the table to the shelf. Figure 15 shows images of experimentation. In this case robot detects object on the table (1) and picks the object up which selected by the operator (2). Then the robot carries the object to the another place (3) and put it on the specified spot (4). We taught grasp pattern and target position to 3 objects which can be detected using LINE-MOD with following sequence.
  1. 1)

    Moving to the spot near the table (Environment centric).

     
  2. 2)

    Picking the object up (Object centric).

     
  3. 3)

    Moving to the spot near the shelf (Environment centric).

     
  4. 4)

    Putting the object on the shelf (Environment centric).

     
Figure 15

Experimentation of pick and place.

In this case, we taught a grasp pattern of objects as object centric, and spots associated the table and the shelf as environment centric. When the position of the table or the shelf is changed, the system can adopt by resetting spot’s position again by humans.

4.1.2 Door opening task

Secondly, we achieved door opening task. To open the door by the robot, human have to teach door axis and rotational direction, door lever axis and rotational direction, the position of these parts, manipulation sequence and amount, respectively. In this experiment, door lever is defined as known object and can be detected using LINE-MOD, human teaches all remaining information.

Figure 16 shows images of door opening operation. In this operation, firstly the robot stands on the front of the door lever (1), then operator defines pivot of the door and position of the door lever putting interactive marker (2), and the door pivot and the door lever is connected by operator (3). Next the robot grasps the door lever (4), and pulls down the lever (5). Finally the robot pull the door with circular orbit, using the pivot as rotation center (6). Sequence of door opening operation is defined as;
  1. 1)

    Moving to the spot near the door.

     
  2. 2)

    Moving head to the door lever.

     
  3. 3)

    Grasping the door lever.

     
  4. 4)

    Revolving down the door lever.

     
  5. 5)

    Pulling the door lever rotating around pivot of the door.

     
  6. 6)

    Revolving up the door lever.

     
  7. 7)

    Holding the door lever off.

     
  8. 8)

    Leaving the door.

     
Figure 16

Experimentation of opening door.

To achieve this sequence, we compared following 3 methods;
  1. A)

    Teleoperating by human with putting interactive markers.

     
  2. B)

    Teleoperating by human using already put interactive markers.

     
  3. C)

    Playing back human’s teleoperation using already put interactive markers and manipulation amount.

     
Figure 17 shows images of the experiment. Method A) took over 600 [s], B) took 158 [s], and C) took 54 [s]. Door opening task achievements 10 times faster using taught operation sequence from human than simple teleoperation. Half-opened door also can be opened repeating same motion sequence using an object centric method with known object recognition using LINE-MOD as shown in Figure 18.
Figure 17

Experimentation of opening door (1): closed door.

Figure 18

Experimentation of opening door (2): opened door.

Note that in this experiment the door has not spring, so it does not close by itself, because the robot cannot open the door completely for its range of motion. However, this is the problem about motion planning and hardware specification, proposed method can be used in situation to open the door which has door closer.

5Conclusion

In this paper, we developed 3D-viewer-based teleoperation user interface that is easy to use and understand for Human Support Robot HSR, and we also shew its usage example according to object pick-and-place task and door opening task. These 2 tasks can not be achieved using only dialog-based HMI because these require to move unresistered spot and to instruct phisical amount of operation, proposed method can realized to achieve these difficult tasks. Especially the proposed system that constructs a 3D map in unknown environments and has intuitive teaching playback function using the virtual robot model can reduce time to achieve task drastically. When robots can construct object models in operation, the proposed task achievement method is completed in robot’s motion, it also can increase usability in real environment. In future work, we will apply operation test by the user to verify the usability of the proposed system and to derive more problems about teleoperation in the real environment.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo
(2)
Advanced Technology Engineering Dept., Partner Robot Div., Toyota Motor Corporation

References

  1. Hashimoto K, Saito F, Yamamoto T, Ikeda K: A field study of the human support robot in the home environment. In 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts. IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, Tokyo, Japan; 2013:143–150. 10.1109/ARSO.2013.6705520View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chitta S, Cohen B, Likhachev M: Planning for autonomous door opening with a mobile manipulator. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference On. IEEE, Anchorage, Alaska; 2010:1799–1806. 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509475View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sturm J, Stachniss C, Burgard W: A probabilistic framework for learning kinematic models of articulated objects. J Artif Intell Res (JAIR) 2011, 41: 477–626.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Azuma H, Kakiuchi Y, Saito M, Okada K, Inaba M: View-base multi-touch gesture interface for furniture manipulation robots. In IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts. IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, California, USA; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Yamazaki K, Tsubouchi T, Tomono M: Furniture model creation through direct teaching to a mobile robot. J Robot Mechatronics 2008,20(2):213–220.Google Scholar
  6. Engelhard N, Endres F, Hess J, Sturm J, Burgard W: Real-time 3d visual slam with a hand-held rgb-d camera. In Proc. of the RGB-D Workshop on 3D Perception in Robotics at the European Robotics Forum. Robotdalen, Vasteras, Sweden; 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Newcombe RA, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison A. J, Kohli P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A: Kinectfusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In IEEE ISMAR. IEEE, Basel, Switzerland; 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Furukawa Y, Curless B, Seitz SM, Szeliski R: Reconstructing building interiors from images. In Computer Vision, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference On. IEEE, Kyoto, Japan; 2009:80–87. 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Yaguchi H, Takaoka Y, Yamamoto T, Inaba M: A method of 3d model generation of indoor environment with manhattan world assumption using 3d camera. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, Kobe, Japan; 2013:759–765. 10.1109/SII.2013.6776686View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinterstoisser SSH, Cagniart C, Ilic S, Konolige K, Navab N, Lepetit V: Multimodal templates for real-time detection of texture-less objects in heavily cluttered scenes. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, Barcelona, Spain; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Gossow D, Leeper A, Hershberger D, Ciocarlie MT: Interactive markers: 3-d user interfaces for ros applications [ros topics]. IEEE Robot Automat Mag 2011,18(4):14–15. 10.1109/MRA.2011.943230View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yaguchi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.